Libya vs South Africa: 2.5.1b Number: Value, per capita
Libya
0 No per person
in 2025
South Africa
0 No per person
in 2025
Libya rank
110th
South Africa rank
108th
2.5.1b Number: Value, per capita over time
- Libya
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Libya, a difference of 0 No per person.
Across all 26 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 110th and South Africa ranks 108th of 167 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | South Africa |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | South Africa |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones), Libya or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Libya as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) between Libya and South Africa?
- 0 No per person, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and South Africa?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Libya and South Africa rank globally for 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)?
- Libya ranks 110th and South Africa ranks 108th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) β Value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) β Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.