Lesotho vs Malta: 2.5.1b Number: Value, per capita
Lesotho
0 No per person
in 2025
Malta
0 No per person
in 2025
Lesotho rank
41st
Malta rank
40th
2.5.1b Number: Value, per capita over time
- Lesotho
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Lesotho, a difference of 0 No per person.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malta ahead.
Lesotho ranks 41st and Malta ranks 40th of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 2 and Malta in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Malta |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Lesotho |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones), Lesotho or Malta?
- Malta, at 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Lesotho as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) between Lesotho and Malta?
- 0 No per person, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Malta?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Lesotho and Malta rank globally for 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)?
- Lesotho ranks 41st and Malta ranks 40th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) β Value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) β Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.