Jamaica vs Norway: 2.5.1b Number: Value, per capita
Jamaica
0 No per person
in 2025
Norway
0 No per person
in 2025
Jamaica rank
66th
Norway rank
69th
2.5.1b Number: Value, per capita over time
- Jamaica
- Norway
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Norway, a difference of 0 No per person.
That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.2 times Norway's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Norway ahead.
Jamaica ranks 66th and Norway ranks 69th of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 2 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Norway |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Jamaica |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones), Jamaica or Norway?
- Jamaica, at 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Norway as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) between Jamaica and Norway?
- 0 No per person, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Norway?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Jamaica and Norway rank globally for 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)?
- Jamaica ranks 66th and Norway ranks 69th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) β Value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) β Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.