Haiti vs Zimbabwe: 2.5.1b Number: Value, per capita
Haiti
0 No per person
in 2025
Zimbabwe
0 No per person
in 2025
Haiti rank
86th
Zimbabwe rank
83rd
2.5.1b Number: Value, per capita over time
- Haiti
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Haiti, a difference of 0 No per person.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Haiti's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Haiti ranks 86th and Zimbabwe ranks 83rd of 167 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones), Haiti or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Haiti as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) between Haiti and Zimbabwe?
- 0 No per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Zimbabwe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Haiti and Zimbabwe rank globally for 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)?
- Haiti ranks 86th and Zimbabwe ranks 83rd of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) β Value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) β Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.