Ghana vs Jordan: 2.5.1b Number: Value, per capita
Ghana
0 No per person
in 2025
Jordan
0 No per person
in 2025
Ghana rank
132nd
Jordan rank
129th
2.5.1b Number: Value, per capita over time
- Ghana
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Ghana, a difference of 0 No per person.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.2 times Ghana's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.
Ghana ranks 132nd and Jordan ranks 129th of 167 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Jordan |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Jordan |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones), Ghana or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Ghana as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) between Ghana and Jordan?
- 0 No per person, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Jordan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Ghana and Jordan rank globally for 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)?
- Ghana ranks 132nd and Jordan ranks 129th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) β Value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) β Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.