Germany vs Kazakhstan: 2.5.1b Number: Value, per capita
Germany
0 No per person
in 2025
Kazakhstan
0 No per person
in 2025
Germany rank
87th
Kazakhstan rank
88th
2.5.1b Number: Value, per capita over time
- Germany
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Germany currently reports 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 No per person.
That makes Germany's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Germany has been ahead every year.
Germany ranks 87th and Kazakhstan ranks 88th of 167 countries.
Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Germany | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Germany |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Germany |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Germany |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones), Germany or Kazakhstan?
- Germany, at 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Kazakhstan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) between Germany and Kazakhstan?
- 0 No per person, with Germany ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Kazakhstan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Germany and Kazakhstan rank globally for 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)?
- Germany ranks 87th and Kazakhstan ranks 88th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) β Value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) β Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.