Croatia vs Latvia: 2.5.1b Number: Value, per capita
Croatia
0 No per person
in 2025
Latvia
0 No per person
in 2025
Croatia rank
38th
Latvia rank
37th
2.5.1b Number: Value, per capita over time
- Croatia
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Croatia, a difference of 0 No per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 38th and Latvia ranks 37th of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Croatia |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones), Croatia or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Croatia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) between Croatia and Latvia?
- 0 No per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Latvia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Latvia rank globally for 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)?
- Croatia ranks 38th and Latvia ranks 37th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) β Value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) β Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.