Brazil vs Cambodia: 2.5.1b Number: Value, per capita
Brazil
0 No per person
in 2025
Cambodia
0 No per person
in 2025
Brazil rank
148th
Cambodia rank
147th
2.5.1b Number: Value, per capita over time
- Brazil
- Cambodia
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Brazil, a difference of 0 No per person.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Cambodia has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 148th and Cambodia ranks 147th of 167 countries.
Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Cambodia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Cambodia |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones), Brazil or Cambodia?
- Cambodia, at 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Brazil as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) between Brazil and Cambodia?
- 0 No per person, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Cambodia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Brazil and Cambodia rank globally for 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)?
- Brazil ranks 148th and Cambodia ranks 147th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) β Value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) β Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.