Bahamas vs Zimbabwe: 2.5.1b Number: Value, per capita
Bahamas
0 No per person
in 2025
Zimbabwe
0 No per person
in 2025
Bahamas rank
85th
Zimbabwe rank
83rd
2.5.1b Number: Value, per capita over time
- Bahamas
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Bahamas, a difference of 0 No per person.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Bahamas's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Bahamas ahead.
Bahamas ranks 85th and Zimbabwe ranks 83rd of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Bahamas |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones), Bahamas or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Bahamas as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) between Bahamas and Zimbabwe?
- 0 No per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Zimbabwe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Bahamas and Zimbabwe rank globally for 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)?
- Bahamas ranks 85th and Zimbabwe ranks 83rd of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) β Value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) β Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.