Algeria vs Japan: 2.5.1b Number: Value, per capita
Algeria
0 No per person
in 2025
Japan
0 No per person
in 2025
Algeria rank
155th
Japan rank
153rd
2.5.1b Number: Value, per capita over time
- Algeria
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Algeria, a difference of 0 No per person.
That makes Japan's figure about 1.1 times Algeria's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Japan ahead.
Algeria ranks 155th and Japan ranks 153rd of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Algeria averaged higher in 2 and Japan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Algeria | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Algeria |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Algeria |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones), Algeria or Japan?
- Japan, at 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Algeria as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) between Algeria and Japan?
- 0 No per person, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Japan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Algeria and Japan rank globally for 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)?
- Algeria ranks 155th and Japan ranks 153rd of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) β Value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) β Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.