Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Russian Federation: 2.5.1b Number: Value, annual growth rate

Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
0.9868 % change on previous year
in 2025
Russian Federation
6.31 % change on previous year
in 2025
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
3rd
Russian Federation rank
4th

2.5.1b Number: Value, annual growth rate over time

  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
  • Russian Federation
050100150200200120132025

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 6.31 % change on previous year against 0.9868 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 5.32 % change on previous year.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 6.4 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Russian Federation ahead.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 3rd and Russian Federation ranks 4th of 34 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Russian Federation Difference Ahead
2000s 22.59 % change on previous year 15.55 % change on previous year 7.04 % change on previous year Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2010s 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year —
2020s 0.2195 % change on previous year 3.66 % change on previous year 3.44 % change on previous year Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones), Least Developed Countries (LDCs) or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at 6.31 % change on previous year against 0.9868 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2025.
What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) between Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Russian Federation?
5.32 % change on previous year, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Russian Federation?
25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
How do Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Russian Federation rank globally for 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 3rd and Russian Federation ranks 4th of 34 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Russian Federation: 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-1b-number-of-transboundary-breeds-including-extinct-ones-value-annual-growth-rate/least-developed-countries-ldcs/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-1b-number-of-transboundary-breeds-including-extinct-ones-value-annual-growth-rate/least-developed-countries-ldcs/russian-federation-2/">Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Russian Federation: 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
228 places, 5,497 data points, 2001–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.