How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Namibia?

24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Central Asia vs Namibia: 2.5.1b Number: Value, annual growth rate

Central Asia

0 % change on previous year

in 2025

Namibia

0 % change on previous year

in 2025

Central Asia rank

8th

Namibia rank

10th

2.5.1b Number: Value, annual growth rate over time

Central Asia
Namibia

How they compare

Central Asia currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Namibia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Namibia ahead.

Central Asia ranks 8th and Namibia ranks 10th of 34 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Central Asia averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Central Asia	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	6.98 % change on previous year	0 % change on previous year	6.98 % change on previous year	Central Asia
2010s	0 % change on previous year	0.766 % change on previous year	0.766 % change on previous year	Namibia
2020s	4.74 % change on previous year	0 % change on previous year	4.74 % change on previous year	Central Asia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones), Central Asia or Namibia?: Central Asia, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Namibia as of 2025.
What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) between Central Asia and Namibia?: 0 % change on previous year, with Central Asia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Namibia?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
How do Central Asia and Namibia rank globally for 2.5.1b number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)?: Central Asia ranks 8th and Namibia ranks 10th of 34 groups.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Asia vs Namibia: 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-1b-number-of-transboundary-breeds-including-extinct-ones-value-annual-growth-rate/central-asia/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-1b-number-of-transboundary-breeds-including-extinct-ones-value-annual-growth-rate/central-asia/namibia/">Central Asia vs Namibia: 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value, annual growth rate
Unit: % change on previous year
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 228 places, 5,497 data points, 2001–2025
Last refreshed: 30 September 2026

The year-on-year percentage change in 2.5.1b Number of transboundary breeds (including extinct ones) — Value. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.