Eritrea vs Suriname: 2.5.1b Number of local: Value, per unit of GDP
Eritrea
0 No per US$ of GDP
in 2011
Suriname
0 No per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Eritrea rank
17th
Suriname rank
18th
2.5.1b Number of local: Value, per unit of GDP over time
- Eritrea
- Suriname
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 0 No per US$ of GDP against 0 No per US$ of GDP in Suriname, a difference of 0 No per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 17th and Suriname ranks 18th of 164 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 0 No per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 0 No per US$ of GDP | 0 No per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, per unit, Eritrea or Suriname?
- Eritrea, at 0 No per US$ of GDP against 0 No per US$ of GDP in Suriname as of 2011.
- What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, per unit between Eritrea and Suriname?
- 0 No per US$ of GDP, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Suriname?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Suriname rank globally for 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, per unit?
- Eritrea ranks 17th and Suriname ranks 18th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.