Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: 2.5.1b Number of local: Value, per square kilometre

Papua New Guinea
0 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0 No per square kilometre
in 2023
Papua New Guinea rank
146th
Zimbabwe rank
149th

2.5.1b Number of local: Value, per square kilometre over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Zimbabwe
0000200020112023

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 0 No per square kilometre against 0 No per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 No per square kilometre.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.

Papua New Guinea ranks 146th and Zimbabwe ranks 149th of 163 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 0 No per square kilometre 0 No per square kilometre 0 No per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
2010s 0 No per square kilometre 0 No per square kilometre 0 No per square kilometre Papua New Guinea
2020s 0 No per square kilometre 0 No per square kilometre 0 No per square kilometre Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, per square, Papua New Guinea or Zimbabwe?
Papua New Guinea, at 0 No per square kilometre against 0 No per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, per square between Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
0 No per square kilometre, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, per square?
Papua New Guinea ranks 146th and Zimbabwe ranks 149th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: 2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-1b-number-of-local-breeds-kept-in-the-country-value-per-square-kilometre/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-1b-number-of-local-breeds-kept-in-the-country-value-per-square-kilometre/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/">Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: 2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value, per square kilometre
Unit
No per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
165 places, 3,737 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.