Malta vs Portugal: 2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value, per capita
Malta
0 No per person
in 2025
Portugal
0 No per person
in 2025
Malta rank
58th
Portugal rank
61st
2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value, per capita over time
- Malta
- Portugal
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Portugal, a difference of 0 No per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malta ahead.
Malta ranks 58th and Portugal ranks 61st of 165 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Malta |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Portugal |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, per capita, Malta or Portugal?
- Malta, at 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Portugal as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, per capita between Malta and Portugal?
- 0 No per person, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Portugal?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Malta and Portugal rank globally for 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, per capita?
- Malta ranks 58th and Portugal ranks 61st of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.