Malawi vs Togo: 2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value, per capita
Malawi
0 No per person
in 2025
Togo
0 No per person
in 2025
Malawi rank
123rd
Togo rank
120th
2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value, per capita over time
- Malawi
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Malawi, a difference of 0 No per person.
That makes Togo's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Togo has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 123rd and Togo ranks 120th of 165 countries.
Togo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Togo |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Togo |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, per capita, Malawi or Togo?
- Togo, at 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Malawi as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, per capita between Malawi and Togo?
- 0 No per person, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Togo?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Malawi and Togo rank globally for 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, per capita?
- Malawi ranks 123rd and Togo ranks 120th of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.