Kazakhstan vs Oman: 2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value, per capita
Kazakhstan
0 No per person
in 2025
Oman
0 No per person
in 2025
Kazakhstan rank
77th
Oman rank
79th
2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value, per capita over time
- Kazakhstan
- Oman
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Oman, a difference of 0 No per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Oman ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 77th and Oman ranks 79th of 165 countries.
Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Oman |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Oman |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, per capita, Kazakhstan or Oman?
- Kazakhstan, at 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Oman as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, per capita between Kazakhstan and Oman?
- 0 No per person, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Oman?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Kazakhstan and Oman rank globally for 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, per capita?
- Kazakhstan ranks 77th and Oman ranks 79th of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.