Japan vs Zimbabwe: 2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value, per capita
Japan
0 No per person
in 2025
Zimbabwe
0 No per person
in 2025
Japan rank
151st
Zimbabwe rank
149th
2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value, per capita over time
- Japan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Japan, a difference of 0 No per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 151st and Zimbabwe ranks 149th of 165 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Japan |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, per capita, Japan or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Japan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, per capita between Japan and Zimbabwe?
- 0 No per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Zimbabwe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Japan and Zimbabwe rank globally for 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, per capita?
- Japan ranks 151st and Zimbabwe ranks 149th of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.