Japan vs Pakistan: 2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value, per capita
Japan
0 No per person
in 2025
Pakistan
0 No per person
in 2025
Japan rank
151st
Pakistan rank
150th
2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value, per capita over time
- Japan
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Japan, a difference of 0 No per person.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Pakistan has been ahead every year.
Japan ranks 151st and Pakistan ranks 150th of 165 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, per capita, Japan or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Japan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, per capita between Japan and Pakistan?
- 0 No per person, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Pakistan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Japan and Pakistan rank globally for 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, per capita?
- Japan ranks 151st and Pakistan ranks 150th of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.