Israel vs Uganda: 2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value, per capita
Israel
0 No per person
in 2025
Uganda
0 No per person
in 2025
Israel rank
157th
Uganda rank
160th
2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value, per capita over time
- Israel
- Uganda
How they compare
Israel currently reports 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Uganda, a difference of 0 No per person.
That makes Israel's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 157th and Uganda ranks 160th of 165 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Israel |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Israel |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, per capita, Israel or Uganda?
- Israel, at 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Uganda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, per capita between Israel and Uganda?
- 0 No per person, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Uganda?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Israel and Uganda rank globally for 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, per capita?
- Israel ranks 157th and Uganda ranks 160th of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.