Cuba vs Czechia: 2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value, per capita
Cuba
0 No per person
in 2025
Czechia
0 No per person
in 2025
Cuba rank
70th
Czechia rank
69th
2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value, per capita over time
- Cuba
- Czechia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Cuba, a difference of 0 No per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Czechia ahead.
Cuba ranks 70th and Czechia ranks 69th of 165 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 2 and Czechia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, per capita, Cuba or Czechia?
- Czechia, at 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Cuba as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, per capita between Cuba and Czechia?
- 0 No per person, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Czechia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Cuba and Czechia rank globally for 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, per capita?
- Cuba ranks 70th and Czechia ranks 69th of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.