Chile vs Serbia: 2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value, per capita
Chile
0 No per person
in 2025
Serbia
0 No per person
in 2025
Chile rank
83rd
Serbia rank
82nd
2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value, per capita over time
- Chile
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Chile, a difference of 0 No per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Serbia ahead.
Chile ranks 83rd and Serbia ranks 82nd of 165 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Serbia |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Chile |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, per capita, Chile or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Chile as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, per capita between Chile and Serbia?
- 0 No per person, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Serbia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Serbia rank globally for 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, per capita?
- Chile ranks 83rd and Serbia ranks 82nd of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.