Brazil vs Israel: 2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value, per capita
Brazil
0 No per person
in 2025
Israel
0 No per person
in 2025
Brazil rank
159th
Israel rank
157th
2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value, per capita over time
- Brazil
- Israel
How they compare
Israel currently reports 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Brazil, a difference of 0 No per person.
That makes Israel's figure about 1.1 times Brazil's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 159th and Israel ranks 157th of 165 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Israel |
| 2010s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Israel |
| 2020s | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | 0 No per person | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, per capita, Brazil or Israel?
- Israel, at 0 No per person against 0 No per person in Brazil as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, per capita between Brazil and Israel?
- 0 No per person, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Israel?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Brazil and Israel rank globally for 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, per capita?
- Brazil ranks 159th and Israel ranks 157th of 165 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.