Chile vs Latvia: 2.5.1b Number of local: Value, annual growth rate
Chile
0 % change on previous year
in 2025
Latvia
0 % change on previous year
in 2025
Chile rank
16th
Latvia rank
16th
2.5.1b Number of local: Value, annual growth rate over time
- Chile
- Latvia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Latvia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Latvia ahead.
Chile ranks 16th and Latvia ranks 16th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 % change on previous year | 5 % change on previous year | 5 % change on previous year | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.339 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0.339 % change on previous year | Chile |
| 2020s | 0.8197 % change on previous year | 5.95 % change on previous year | 5.13 % change on previous year | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, annual, Chile or Latvia?
- Chile, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Latvia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, annual between Chile and Latvia?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Latvia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Latvia rank globally for 2.5.1b number of local breeds kept in the country — value, annual?
- Chile ranks 16th and Latvia ranks 16th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as 2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in 2.5.1b Number of local breeds kept in the country — Value. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.