Serbia vs Zimbabwe: 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)

Serbia
5,588 No
in 2024
Zimbabwe
6,231 No
in 2024
Serbia rank
64th
Zimbabwe rank
62nd

2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) over time

  • Serbia
  • Zimbabwe
02.0k4.0k6.0k199520092024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 6,231 No against 5,588 No in Serbia, a difference of 643 No.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Serbia ahead.

Serbia ranks 64th and Zimbabwe ranks 62nd of 114 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Serbia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 5,509 No 283 No 5,226 No Serbia
2000s 5,518 No 1,916 No 3,602 No Serbia
2010s 5,561 No 6,028 No 466.86 No Zimbabwe
2020s 5,588 No 6,231 No 643 No Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number), Serbia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 6,231 No against 5,588 No in Serbia as of 2024.
What is the difference in 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) between Serbia and Zimbabwe?
643 No, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Zimbabwe?
15 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do Serbia and Zimbabwe rank globally for 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)?
Serbia ranks 64th and Zimbabwe ranks 62nd of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia vs Zimbabwe: 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-1a-plant-genetic-resources-accessions-stored-ex-situ-number-value/serbia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-1a-plant-genetic-resources-accessions-stored-ex-situ-number-value/serbia/zimbabwe/">Serbia vs Zimbabwe: 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) — Value
Unit
No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
155 places, 2,324 data points, 1995–2024
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.