Russian Federation vs United Republic of Tanzania: 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)
2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) over time
- Russian Federation
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 200,717 No against 7,279 No in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 193,438 No.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 27.6 times United Republic of Tanzania's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.
Russian Federation ranks 8th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 114 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 199,981 No | 1,363 No | 198,618 No | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 200,343 No | 3,447 No | 196,896 No | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 200,702 No | 5,913 No | 194,790 No | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 200,717 No | 7,279 No | 193,438 No | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number), Russian Federation or United Republic of Tanzania?
- Russian Federation, at 200,717 No against 7,279 No in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) between Russian Federation and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 193,438 No, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Russian Federation and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)?
- Russian Federation ranks 8th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 7th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.