New Zealand vs Regional Centres (FAO) (2.5.1.a): 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)
2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) over time
- New Zealand
- Regional Centres (FAO) (2.5.1.a)
How they compare
Regional Centres (FAO) (2.5.1.a) currently reports 67,027 No against 36,144 No in New Zealand, a difference of 30,883 No.
That makes Regional Centres (FAO) (2.5.1.a)'s figure about 1.9 times New Zealand's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Regional Centres (FAO) (2.5.1.a) has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 30th and Regional Centres (FAO) (2.5.1.a) ranks 28th of 114 countries.
Regional Centres (FAO) (2.5.1.a) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Regional Centres (FAO) (2.5.1.a) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 19,395 No | 35,244 No | 15,849 No | Regional Centres (FAO) (2.5.1.a) |
| 2000s | 26,400 No | 42,272 No | 15,872 No | Regional Centres (FAO) (2.5.1.a) |
| 2010s | 34,437 No | 53,902 No | 19,465 No | Regional Centres (FAO) (2.5.1.a) |
| 2020s | 36,144 No | 59,803 No | 23,659 No | Regional Centres (FAO) (2.5.1.a) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number), New Zealand or Regional Centres (FAO) (2.5.1.a)?
- Regional Centres (FAO) (2.5.1.a), at 67,027 No against 36,144 No in New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) between New Zealand and Regional Centres (FAO) (2.5.1.a)?
- 30,883 No, with Regional Centres (FAO) (2.5.1.a) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Regional Centres (FAO) (2.5.1.a)?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do New Zealand and Regional Centres (FAO) (2.5.1.a) rank globally for 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)?
- New Zealand ranks 30th and Regional Centres (FAO) (2.5.1.a) ranks 28th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.