Latvia vs Papua New Guinea: 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)
2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) over time
- Latvia
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 2,798 No against 2,662 No in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 136 No.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Latvia ranks 79th and Papua New Guinea ranks 80th of 114 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Papua New Guinea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 704 No | 1,048 No | 344 No | Papua New Guinea |
| 2000s | 1,263 No | 1,268 No | 5.5 No | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 2,066 No | 1,536 No | 529.57 No | Latvia |
| 2020s | 2,589 No | 2,562 No | 27.8 No | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number), Latvia or Papua New Guinea?
- Latvia, at 2,798 No against 2,662 No in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) between Latvia and Papua New Guinea?
- 136 No, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Papua New Guinea?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)?
- Latvia ranks 79th and Papua New Guinea ranks 80th of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.