Latin America and the Caribbean vs Poland: 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)
2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) over time
- Latin America and the Caribbean
- Poland
How they compare
Latin America and the Caribbean currently reports 504,164 No against 90,687 No in Poland, a difference of 413,477 No.
That makes Latin America and the Caribbean's figure about 5.6 times Poland's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Latin America and the Caribbean has been ahead every year.
Latin America and the Caribbean ranks 11th and Poland ranks 13th of 32 groups.
Latin America and the Caribbean has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latin America and the Caribbean | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 243,847 No | 62,727 No | 181,120 No | Latin America and the Caribbean |
| 2000s | 299,062 No | 73,406 No | 225,656 No | Latin America and the Caribbean |
| 2010s | 451,855 No | 84,633 No | 367,223 No | Latin America and the Caribbean |
| 2020s | 492,403 No | 88,971 No | 403,432 No | Latin America and the Caribbean |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number), Latin America and the Caribbean or Poland?
- Latin America and the Caribbean, at 504,164 No against 90,687 No in Poland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) between Latin America and the Caribbean and Poland?
- 413,477 No, with Latin America and the Caribbean ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latin America and the Caribbean and Poland?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Latin America and the Caribbean and Poland rank globally for 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)?
- Latin America and the Caribbean ranks 11th and Poland ranks 13th of 32 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.