Eswatini vs Finland: 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)

Eswatini
746 No
in 2024
Finland
721 No
in 2024
Eswatini rank
104th
Finland rank
106th

2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Finland
2004006008001.0k199520092024

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 746 No against 721 No in Finland, a difference of 25 No.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Finland ahead.

Eswatini ranks 104th and Finland ranks 106th of 114 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Finland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Finland Difference Ahead
1990s 177 No 932 No 755 No Finland
2000s 635.5 No 964.5 No 329 No Finland
2010s 743.29 No 845.29 No 102 No Finland
2020s 746 No 720.8 No 25.2 No Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number), Eswatini or Finland?
Eswatini, at 746 No against 721 No in Finland as of 2024.
What is the difference in 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) between Eswatini and Finland?
25 No, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Finland?
15 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do Eswatini and Finland rank globally for 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)?
Eswatini ranks 104th and Finland ranks 106th of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Finland: 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-1a-plant-genetic-resources-accessions-stored-ex-situ-number-value/eswatini/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-1a-plant-genetic-resources-accessions-stored-ex-situ-number-value/eswatini/finland/">Eswatini vs Finland: 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) — Value
Unit
No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
155 places, 2,324 data points, 1995–2024
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.