Cuba vs Uruguay: 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)

Cuba
19,929 No
in 2024
Uruguay
24,346 No
in 2024
Cuba rank
39th
Uruguay rank
36th

2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) over time

  • Cuba
  • Uruguay
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k199520092024

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 24,346 No against 19,929 No in Cuba, a difference of 4,417 No.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.2 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 39th and Uruguay ranks 36th of 114 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 3 and Uruguay in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s 11,533 No 2,015 No 9,518 No Cuba
2000s 14,083 No 9,198 No 4,884 No Cuba
2010s 18,565 No 16,458 No 2,107 No Cuba
2020s 19,811 No 20,668 No 857.4 No Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number), Cuba or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 24,346 No against 19,929 No in Cuba as of 2024.
What is the difference in 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) between Cuba and Uruguay?
4,417 No, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Uruguay?
15 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do Cuba and Uruguay rank globally for 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)?
Cuba ranks 39th and Uruguay ranks 36th of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Uruguay: 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-1a-plant-genetic-resources-accessions-stored-ex-situ-number-value/cuba/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-1a-plant-genetic-resources-accessions-stored-ex-situ-number-value/cuba/uruguay/">Cuba vs Uruguay: 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) — Value
Unit
No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
155 places, 2,324 data points, 1995–2024
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.