Croatia vs Estonia: 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)

Croatia
4,634 No
in 2024
Estonia
3,732 No
in 2024
Croatia rank
70th
Estonia rank
71st

2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) over time

  • Croatia
  • Estonia
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k199520092024

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 4,634 No against 3,732 No in Estonia, a difference of 902 No.

That makes Croatia's figure about 1.2 times Estonia's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Croatia has been ahead every year.

Croatia ranks 70th and Estonia ranks 71st of 114 countries.

Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Estonia Difference Ahead
1990s 2,279 No 1,909 No 370 No Croatia
2000s 2,347 No 2,117 No 230 No Croatia
2010s 3,401 No 2,929 No 472.86 No Croatia
2020s 4,424 No 3,476 No 948 No Croatia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number), Croatia or Estonia?
Croatia, at 4,634 No against 3,732 No in Estonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) between Croatia and Estonia?
902 No, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Estonia?
15 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do Croatia and Estonia rank globally for 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)?
Croatia ranks 70th and Estonia ranks 71st of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Estonia: 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-1a-plant-genetic-resources-accessions-stored-ex-situ-number-value/croatia/estonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-1a-plant-genetic-resources-accessions-stored-ex-situ-number-value/croatia/estonia/">Croatia vs Estonia: 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) — Value
Unit
No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
155 places, 2,324 data points, 1995–2024
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.