Chile vs Kenya: 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)

Chile
47,065 No
in 2024
Kenya
51,405 No
in 2024
Chile rank
24th
Kenya rank
21st

2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) over time

  • Chile
  • Kenya
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k199520092024

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 51,405 No against 47,065 No in Chile, a difference of 4,340 No.

That makes Kenya's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Kenya has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 24th and Kenya ranks 21st of 114 countries.

Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Kenya Difference Ahead
1990s 11,594 No 43,722 No 32,128 No Kenya
2000s 14,539 No 46,258 No 31,719 No Kenya
2010s 38,247 No 50,292 No 12,045 No Kenya
2020s 46,285 No 51,405 No 5,120 No Kenya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number), Chile or Kenya?
Kenya, at 51,405 No against 47,065 No in Chile as of 2024.
What is the difference in 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) between Chile and Kenya?
4,340 No, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Kenya?
15 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do Chile and Kenya rank globally for 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)?
Chile ranks 24th and Kenya ranks 21st of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Kenya: 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-1a-plant-genetic-resources-accessions-stored-ex-situ-number-value/chile/kenya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-1a-plant-genetic-resources-accessions-stored-ex-situ-number-value/chile/kenya/">Chile vs Kenya: 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) — Value
Unit
No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
155 places, 2,324 data points, 1995–2024
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.