Chile vs Hungary: 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)

Chile
47,065 No
in 2024
Hungary
49,367 No
in 2024
Chile rank
24th
Hungary rank
22nd

2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) over time

  • Chile
  • Hungary
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k199520092024

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 49,367 No against 47,065 No in Chile, a difference of 2,302 No.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 24th and Hungary ranks 22nd of 114 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Hungary Difference Ahead
1990s 11,594 No 37,885 No 26,291 No Hungary
2000s 14,539 No 43,912 No 29,373 No Hungary
2010s 38,247 No 47,875 No 9,628 No Hungary
2020s 46,285 No 49,388 No 3,103 No Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number), Chile or Hungary?
Hungary, at 49,367 No against 47,065 No in Chile as of 2024.
What is the difference in 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) between Chile and Hungary?
2,302 No, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Hungary?
15 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do Chile and Hungary rank globally for 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)?
Chile ranks 24th and Hungary ranks 22nd of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Hungary: 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-1a-plant-genetic-resources-accessions-stored-ex-situ-number-value/chile/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-1a-plant-genetic-resources-accessions-stored-ex-situ-number-value/chile/hungary/">Chile vs Hungary: 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) — Value
Unit
No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
155 places, 2,324 data points, 1995–2024
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.