Belarus vs Ecuador: 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)
2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) over time
- Belarus
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 29,756 No against 27,494 No in Belarus, a difference of 2,262 No.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 34th and Ecuador ranks 32nd of 114 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,144 No | 20,253 No | 19,109 No | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 2,837 No | 22,932 No | 20,096 No | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 21,316 No | 27,676 No | 6,360 No | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 27,494 No | 29,413 No | 1,919 No | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number), Belarus or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 29,756 No against 27,494 No in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) between Belarus and Ecuador?
- 2,262 No, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ecuador?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Ecuador rank globally for 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)?
- Belarus ranks 34th and Ecuador ranks 32nd of 114 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.