Azerbaijan vs Peru: 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)

Azerbaijan
13,430 No
in 2024
Peru
15,257 No
in 2024
Azerbaijan rank
46th
Peru rank
44th

2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Peru
05.0k10.0k15.0k199520092024

How they compare

Peru currently reports 15,257 No against 13,430 No in Azerbaijan, a difference of 1,827 No.

That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Azerbaijan's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Peru ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 46th and Peru ranks 44th of 114 countries.

Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Peru Difference Ahead
1990s 6,075 No 9,439 No 3,364 No Peru
2000s 7,891 No 11,208 No 3,316 No Peru
2010s 12,401 No 13,114 No 713.57 No Peru
2020s 13,391 No 15,832 No 2,441 No Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number), Azerbaijan or Peru?
Peru, at 15,257 No against 13,430 No in Azerbaijan as of 2024.
What is the difference in 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) between Azerbaijan and Peru?
1,827 No, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Peru?
15 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do Azerbaijan and Peru rank globally for 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)?
Azerbaijan ranks 46th and Peru ranks 44th of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs Peru: 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-1a-plant-genetic-resources-accessions-stored-ex-situ-number-value/azerbaijan/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-1a-plant-genetic-resources-accessions-stored-ex-situ-number-value/azerbaijan/peru/">Azerbaijan vs Peru: 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) — Value
Unit
No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
155 places, 2,324 data points, 1995–2024
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.