Austria vs Myanmar: 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)

Austria
12,071 No
in 2024
Myanmar
12,050 No
in 2024
Austria rank
50th
Myanmar rank
51st

2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) over time

  • Austria
  • Myanmar
4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k12.0k199520092024

How they compare

Austria currently reports 12,071 No against 12,050 No in Myanmar, a difference of 21 No.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 50th and Myanmar ranks 51st of 114 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 3 and Myanmar in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Myanmar Difference Ahead
1990s 5,874 No 3,214 No 2,660 No Austria
2000s 8,549 No 7,966 No 582.5 No Austria
2010s 11,829 No 11,705 No 123.86 No Austria
2020s 11,889 No 12,050 No 161.4 No Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number), Austria or Myanmar?
Austria, at 12,071 No against 12,050 No in Myanmar as of 2024.
What is the difference in 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) between Austria and Myanmar?
21 No, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Myanmar?
15 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do Austria and Myanmar rank globally for 2.5.1a plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)?
Austria ranks 50th and Myanmar ranks 51st of 114 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Myanmar: 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-1a-plant-genetic-resources-accessions-stored-ex-situ-number-value/austria/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/2-5-1a-plant-genetic-resources-accessions-stored-ex-situ-number-value/austria/myanmar/">Austria vs Myanmar: 2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
2.5.1a Plant genetic resources accessions stored ex situ (number) — Value
Unit
No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
155 places, 2,324 data points, 1995–2024
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.