Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Philippines: 15.6.1 Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements
15.6.1 Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements over time
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
- Philippines
How they compare
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 8,550 No against 2,035 No in Philippines, a difference of 6,515 No.
That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 4.2 times Philippines's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 14th and Philippines ranks 12th of 33 groups.
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 5,675 No | 1,274 No | 4,401 No | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 2020s | 8,246 No | 1,884 No | 6,362 No | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher 15.6.1 total reported number of standard material transfer agreements, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Philippines?
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 8,550 No against 2,035 No in Philippines as of 2025.
- What is the difference in 15.6.1 total reported number of standard material transfer agreements between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Philippines?
- 6,515 No, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Philippines?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Philippines rank globally for 15.6.1 total reported number of standard material transfer agreements?
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 14th and Philippines ranks 12th of 33 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 15.6.1 Total reported number of Standard Material Transfer Agreements (SMTAs) — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.