Mongolia vs Poland: 15.4.2 Mountain area: Nival — Value

Mongolia
8 km2
in 2021
Poland
0 km2
in 2021
Mongolia rank
29th
Poland rank
31st

15.4.2 Mountain area: Nival — Value over time

  • Mongolia
  • Poland
02468200020102021

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 8 km2 against 0 km2 in Poland, a difference of 8 km2.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.

Mongolia ranks 29th and Poland ranks 31st of 31 countries.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Poland Difference Ahead
2000s 8 km2 0 km2 8 km2 Mongolia
2010s 8 km2 0 km2 8 km2 Mongolia
2020s 8 km2 0 km2 8 km2 Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 15.4.2 mountain area: nival — value, Mongolia or Poland?
Mongolia, at 8 km2 against 0 km2 in Poland as of 2021.
What is the difference in 15.4.2 mountain area: nival — value between Mongolia and Poland?
8 km2, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Poland?
6 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do Mongolia and Poland rank globally for 15.4.2 mountain area: nival — value?
Mongolia ranks 29th and Poland ranks 31st of 31 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 15.4.2 Mountain area: Nival — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs Poland: 15.4.2 Mountain area: Nival — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/15-4-2-mountain-area-nival-value/mongolia/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/15-4-2-mountain-area-nival-value/mongolia/poland/">Mongolia vs Poland: 15.4.2 Mountain area: Nival — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
15.4.2 Mountain area: Nival — Value
Unit
km2
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
50 places, 300 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.