Costa Rica vs North Macedonia: 15.4.2 Mountain area: Alpine — Value

Costa Rica
42 km2
in 2021
North Macedonia
42 km2
in 2021
Costa Rica rank
49th
North Macedonia rank
49th

15.4.2 Mountain area: Alpine — Value over time

  • Costa Rica
  • North Macedonia
010203040200020102021

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 42 km2 against 42 km2 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0 km2.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 49th and North Macedonia ranks 49th of 57 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica North Macedonia Difference Ahead
2000s 42 km2 41.5 km2 0.5 km2 Costa Rica
2010s 42 km2 42 km2 0 km2
2020s 42 km2 42 km2 0 km2

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher 15.4.2 mountain area: alpine — value, Costa Rica or North Macedonia?
Costa Rica, at 42 km2 against 42 km2 in North Macedonia as of 2021.
What is the difference in 15.4.2 mountain area: alpine — value between Costa Rica and North Macedonia?
0 km2, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and North Macedonia?
6 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
How do Costa Rica and North Macedonia rank globally for 15.4.2 mountain area: alpine — value?
Costa Rica ranks 49th and North Macedonia ranks 49th of 57 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as 15.4.2 Mountain area: Alpine — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs North Macedonia: 15.4.2 Mountain area: Alpine — Value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/15-4-2-mountain-area-alpine-value/costa-rica/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/15-4-2-mountain-area-alpine-value/costa-rica/north-macedonia/">Costa Rica vs North Macedonia: 15.4.2 Mountain area: Alpine — Value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
15.4.2 Mountain area: Alpine — Value
Unit
km2
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
82 places, 492 data points, 2000–2021
Last refreshed

As the custodian agency of 22 SDG indicators, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is responsible for curating and refining the methodologies of these indicators, collecting data from national sources, ensuring their quality and compatibility with applicable standards and classifications, and disseminating data at global level. This FAOSTAT domain complements the global SDG database administered by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), as well as FAO’s SDG indicators portal, by providing access to the available data for all SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship. While this metadata page provides summary information on all SDG indicators data disseminated through FAOSTAT, indicator-specific metadata can be accessed from the link on the right hand navigation column. This additional metadata file provides details on the methodology used to compile each indicators, their data sources and the contact information of the relevant FAO focal point. It includes the links to the official SDG Indicator metadata documents accessible from the UNSD global SDG database.SDG Indicators under FAO custodianship, consisting of 22 indicators and 66 series that fall under six goals: • Goal 2: End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture.• Goal 5: Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.• Goal 6: Clean water and sanitation: Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all.• Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production.• Goal 14: Life below water: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources.• Goal 15: Life on land: Sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, halt and reverse land degradation, halt biodiversity loss.